1/3/2023 0 Comments Bombardier challenger 300![]() ![]() Also like the big jets, the heated and pressurized baggage bin is accessible from the cabin. A flat floor provides greater comfort and a feeling of spaciousness that was ordinarily reserved for large-cabin jets. What more do you need?”Ĭabin configurations vary, but Challenger 300s typically have eight to nine passenger seats, not including a belted potty. Selbert summed up the avionics saying that “the Proline 21 system isn’t new, but it works beautifully and is easy to use. Late models also have synthetic vision, although one operator wasn’t too impressed by it. The dual IRS provide better redundancy for overseas trips. Very late models also add dual inertial reference systems (IRS) instead of attitude heading reference systems (AHRS) found in earlier copies. #Bombardier challenger 300 pro#Up front is Rockwell Collins’ Pro Line 21 suite with a Collins 5000 FMS. “I do know that for 135 operations it has insufficient oxygen bottle quantity to go to Hawaii with more than six passengers without taking along supplemental oxygen,” said Selbert. In real-world use, it falls well short of its claimed 3,000-nautical-mile range. When it comes to all-out range, the C元0 is good for about 2,700 nautical miles, making it a true transcontinental airplane. First-hour fuel burn is around 2,000 to 2,200 pounds, then 1,600 to 2,000 pounds per hour during subsequent hours depending on altitude. Range is greatly dependent on altitude flown, according to one operator. Superlative speed is Mach 0.83, although operators I spoke to typically cruise at M0.79-0.80. Part 135 ‘wet’ numbers can easily be made on a 5,000-foot runway.” As for landing, Selbert said, “this thing flat-out stops,” with actual landing distances in the 2,200- to 2,600-foot range if needed. ![]() Kurt Selbert, who flies C元0s for a fleet operator, said runway performance “is where the 300 really shines. Another pilot complained that the C元0 flew like a truck, so it likely comes down to what you compare the C元0 to. He preferred the handling of the Hawker but described the C元0 as pleasant to hand fly. He said the C元0 climbs at maximum gross takeoff weight direct to FL410 and even FL430 if temps are cool. The C元0 is larger yet has far superior runway performance. I spoke with a pilot from a large corporation that replaced its Hawker 800 fleet with Challenger 300s. Powerplant | (2) 6,826-lbst Honeywell HTF-7000īalanced field length (sea level) | 4,810 ft ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |